Skip to main content
HOWAICITE CASE STUDIES / MEASURED EVIDENCE

Case studies that show the denominator.

Real measurement notes with fixed questions, provider provenance, failed-run handling and explicit limits—not anonymous uplift claims.

Inspectable evidenceProvider provenanceLimits kept visible
These are evidence case studies, not customer testimonials.

HowAICite sells software in the category and produced these measurement notes. Customer relationships are never implied. A missing or failed observation is disclosed and excluded—not silently converted into a negative result.

01 · Self-measurement baselineBaseline; no improvement claim

HowAICite appeared in 0 of 20 measured answers

Ten US-English buyer questions observed twice through Perplexity Sonar API. No own-brand mention or own-domain citation was observed.

0 / 20brand mentions
Measured scope
Perplexity Sonar API · sonar-pro · United States · English · September 23–24, 2026
Denominator
20 valid answers from 20 attempted runs
Inspect method and evidence →
02 · Competitor benchmarkObservation-level CSV published

Profound and Peec AI led a 25-answer category benchmark

Ten non-branded AI visibility questions across four provider APIs. HowAICite appeared in none; Profound appeared in 16 and Peec AI in 14 valid answers.

25 / 30valid provider runs
Measured scope
OpenAI, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini APIs · United States · English · October 1, 2026
Denominator
25 valid answers; five provider failures excluded and disclosed
Inspect method and evidence →
03 · Independent product researchNot commissioned or endorsed by the measured brand

One Australian HR brand appeared in all 10 completed unbranded answers

Six frozen buyer questions were attempted across four provider APIs. The note separates completion, brand mention and own-domain citation denominators.

20 / 24completed provider runs
Measured scope
OpenAI, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini APIs · Australia · English · September 21, 2026
Denominator
20 completed runs; four incomplete responses excluded
Inspect method and evidence →
PUBLICATION STANDARD

What every HowAICite case study must disclose.

Question panel

The exact buyer questions and whether they were selected, frozen or weighted.

Observation scope

Provider, model when available, requested market, language and collection time.

Valid denominator

Attempted, completed, failed, missing and excluded observations remain distinct.

Outcome boundary

Mention, recommendation and citation are separate; none automatically proves revenue or causality.

NEXT EVIDENCE

The next legitimate case study needs a matched recheck.

The October competitor benchmark is the current before-state. After indexing and independent distribution, HowAICite will repeat the same question, provider, market and language combinations. Any change will be published beside—not in place of—the baseline.

Read the measurement method →

See who AI recommends instead of you.

Run a free battle scan on your domain. It asks the AIs real buyer questions and shows which rivals they name. No signup.